[Eric I don't think you really meant to conceal this from Karl and Patrice, so I've added the Cc: back. Please be careful not to drop it.]
>>> "Eric" == Eric Siegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Eric> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:19:05PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: [...] >> Yeah! That's the idea! Type in, ``make html'' and any html-making >> gets triggered, whether it is texinfo based or not. :-) Eric> Or, indeed, whether part is texinfo-based *and* part not. Of Eric> course, the target for making the texinfo-based subset of the Eric> HTML might indeed be "texinfohtml", and correspondingly for Eric> install and uninstall. But that should be purely a detail of Eric> automake's implementation: Eric> html: texinfohtml whatever_other_html_targets_make_sense Eric> It need not, and IMO should not, be mentioned in the coding Eric> standards. This makes sense to me. `make html' is not a problem. However if `make install-html' and `make uninstall-html' are introduced and must (as we all expect) install more than just makeinfo-generated files, then the GNU Coding Standards should also define a destination directory for these other files. Something like $htmldir. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz
