Hello! On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:48:12AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 16:15 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=automake&pr=492
> > We were talking about the issue why Automake doesn't emit proper rules > > for compiling (pre processed) Assembler files (the .S ones) when using > > `AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([subdir-objects])'. > > > > When using code file `libfoo_a_SOURCES = somewhere/a.S', Automake > > currently assembles `somewhere/a.S' and puts `a.o' into the current > > directory (as opposed to `somewhere/a.o'), but when creating `libfoo.a' > > it wants to add `somewhere/a.o', which will then obviously fail. > > This is a known issue (reported > 2 years ago) and supposed to be fixed > in automake-cvs (me and somebody else contributed patches to implement > this behavior) Indeed I can confirm that this isn't a problem anymore with the cvs version of Automake. Someone might close this bug report now. > Unfortunately so far, there had not been a new automake release since > then. Is there already an estimation possible when this will happen? Regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
