On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:33, NightStrike wrote: > > On 3/7/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, March 8, 2008 01:23, NightStrike wrote: > > >> >> > Does automake support building shared libraries without using > >> >> >libtool? > > >> > How would one go about doing it? in a nutshell.. > >> > >> Oh, I forgot, sorry: there is a special impediment, namely that I won't > >> help people to do it. No reason making myself more work needlessly. > > > > That's rather harsh... no need to be mean about it. I was asking at a > > very high level, not asking for step by step instructions. > > Hey, I didn't intend to be mean about it at all. I don't mind if people
Ok, forgotten :) > recommend non-autotools solutions on this list (as long as they don't put > autotools down unreasonably). All I'm saying is that I don't go out of > my way and think about these issues, too. If you have a special problem > and can describe it, I may well look into it. But not doing so for any > reason is not harsh. It's just my choice. Maybe someone else helps you > (or maybe someone else writes such an obviously wrong answer that I will > feel obliged to correct ;-). I can understand that. > At a very high level: Makefile.am files are pretty much just Makefiles > with extra syntactic sugar. So you can write plain make rules. Do > whatever you did with make before you used Automake. That sounds reasonable. Thanks!
