On Monday 2008-12-15 21:48, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >On Monday 2008-12-15 21:19, William Pursell wrote: >> >>Thanks for this Jan, it is really nice functionality. I don't >>know if this is a portability issue, but I think it would be nice >>to change $< to $? in this section: >> >>> + 'am__1verbose_CCLD_1 = @echo " CCLD " $@ "<-" $<;', >>> + 'am__1verbose_CXX_1 = @echo " CXX " $@ "<-" $<;', >>> + 'am__1verbose_CXXLD_1 = @echo " CXXLD " $@ "<-" $<;', > >The intention of using $< was that only one file was shown on the >right side of the arrow, because all the other files in $^, including >header files, and I certainly don't need nor want that displayed as >it is a huge list. > >The make info pages mention that $? expands to “all the prerequisites >that are newer than the target”, and that sounds like there could be >more than just the .c file. > >I just noticed that LD should have used $^.
Replying to myself - no it should not :p gmake's $^ is not supported by BSD make. And BSD make's $> is not supported by gmake. ( :-/ )^2
