Hello Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 02:56:08AM CEST: > On Sunday 01 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > 3) Whether to document the s/$/-am/ rule for the per-directory > > target so it then also holds for user-provided recursive rules. > > (If yes, then we could share the rule code text between both.) > What about getting rid of the old `foo-am' targets altogheter, > substituting them with `foo-local' instead, which is more natural and > intuitive? The *-am naming is unfortunately used by several packages already too (yes, they override e.g., all-am) and I'm not sure whether I want to break that. > Then we could let the user implement his own recursive > targets in a uniform fashion w.r.t. automake-generated recursive > targets (and thus also still share the rule code text). Not sure what you mean here. Thanks, Ralf
