2012/1/20 Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>: >> One interesting thing would be to add some simple automake feature to >> allow specifying this stuff explicitly via some interface >> (e.g. AM_EXTRA_SOURCE_FILES([blah.c barf.h]) in configure, or something >> like that). That might make it possible to really do this stuff >> correctly without too much work for the developer, by letting him take >> advantage of some of the lower-level automake machinery. > > This sort of thing is already well supported by Automake via Makefile > includes. But it does require that automake be executed again.
Right, my intent is something that _doesn't_ require that, which can be handled entirely by the configure script. [That's more or less the whole point of this thread, right?] -miles -- Cat is power. Cat is peace.
