Miles Bader <mi...@gnu.org> writes: > [Relying on source-code execute bits always being correctly maintained > is one of those things that ... well... doesn't really feel very robust. > I dunno, maybe it's just me...]
Doesn't every package with a configure script rely on this? I suppose that people could chmod +x the configure script before running it, but I've never had to do that. -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
