On Mar 7, 2018 16:05, "Mathieu Lirzin" <m...@gnu.org> wrote:

John Calcote <john.calc...@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Matthias,
> If you have any suggestions on documents I can read or software I can
>> to
>> prepare for this project I'll be glad to check them. I know texinfo is
>> written
>> in Perl and generates an AST so I'll check that.
> A Makefile.am file is really just a Makefile with embellishments. It seems
> like your ast would have to incorporate most of make’s syntax to work
> correctly.
> The reason Perl was chosen to begin with is because of its great text
> processing capabilities as, ultimately, all automake really does is copy
> the file directly to the output Makefile.in file, filtering out automake
> stuff along the way and injecting make snippets generated from the
> constructs.
> This may not appear obvious at first because many simpler Makefile.am
> contain only automake stuff. But anything found in the Makefile.am file
> that automake doesn’t recognize is assumed to be proper make script and
> copied directly to the output file.
> I suggest making your ast handle non automake chunks as a specific token
> type designed to be passed through without modifications.

I agree that using a coarse grained AST is a good first approach.
Exploration and evaluation of a finer grained approach later during this
GSoC could be interesting too.

Thanks for your input.

Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37

 What problem does the AST solve?

Reply via email to