On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 2:04 PM Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 05:48:02PM -0400, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou wrote: > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 5:26 PM Karl Berry <k...@freefriends.org> wrote: > > > > All I can say is that autoconf surely probes the limits of m4 behavior > > > in every regard. So any incompatibility whatsoever is likely to be a > > > problem. --happy hacking, karl. > > > > I plan on byte-for-byte compatibility with GNU m4 1.4.19. > > I'd rather you aim for byte-for-byte compatibility with the > just-released 1.4.20 instead.
Okay, will do! > > It seems to > > work that way for now, but I'd like any bug reports. I also plan to > > try it more extensively myself with autotools projects soon, but I > > figured that I'd release it as soon as possible. > > I will test to see how it fares against my m4 scripts. I suspect it > won't be long before I find an incompatibility... Yes, in fact I just realized that I forgot to implement $@. Let me shape it up a bit. The v0.3 version is not yet ready for wider testing. Regards, Nikolaos Chatzikonstantinou
