automake  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: First draft of application to Sovereign Tech Fund Christoph Grüninger
  • Re: First draft of application to Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
  • Re: First draft of application to Sovereign Tech Fund Christoph Grüninger
  • Re: First draft of application to Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
  • Re: First draft of application to Sovereign Tech Fund Detlef Riekenberg
  • Re: First draft of application to Sovereign Tech Fund Zack Weinberg
  • Re: First draft of application to Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Christoph Grüninger
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Christoph Grüninger
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Christoph Grüninger
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Christoph Grüninger
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Christoph Grüninger
  • Re: Bug Resilience Program of German Sovereign Tech Fund Karl Berry
• How to force libtool to use CXX mode? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: How to force libtool to use CXX mode? Karl Berry
  • Re: How to force libtool to use CXX mode? Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: How to force libtool to use CXX mode? Karl Berry
• GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Karl Berry
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Alan D. Salewski
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor dherring
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Peter Johansson
  • Should the GNU Coding Standards make a recommendation about aclocal's `--install` flag? (was: "Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor") Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Tomas Volf
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Bruno Haible
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: follow-up on backdoor CPU usage (was: libsystemd dependencies) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: reproducible dists and builds (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: automated release building service Bruno Haible
  • Re: automated release building service Tomas Volf
  • Re: automated release building service Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: automated release building service Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: binary data in source trees (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alexandre Oliva
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: checking aclocal m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Sam James
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: detecting modified m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • role of GNU build system in recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: role of GNU build system in recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Blake
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Karl Berry
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: compressed release distribution formats (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
• build setup with variables fail aotto
  • Re: build setup with variables fail aotto
• building a program with ghc PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
• C library promoted to C++ linkage due to optional C++ source module Bob Friesenhahn
  • C library promoted to C++ linkage due to optional C++ source module Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: C library promoted to C++ linkage due to optional C++ source module Karl Berry
  • Re: C library promoted to C++ linkage due to optional C++ source module Bob Friesenhahn
• purpose of line ".. contents:: :depth: 2" in test-suite.log? Karl Berry
  • Re: purpose of line ".. contents:: :depth: 2" in test-suite.log? Russ Allbery
• Unavailable due to hardware problems Zack Weinberg
• automake-1.16j pretest available: please test Karl Berry
  • Re: [platform-testers] automake-1.16j pretest available: please test Frederic Berat
• 1.16j: test release incoming Jim Meyering
• Typo in NEWS section "New in 1.17" and "New in 1.15" Hans Ulrich Niedermann
  • Re: Typo in NEWS section "New in 1.17" and "New in 1.15" Karl Berry
• What does (did?) it mean when aclocal exits with code 63? Zack Weinberg
  • Re: What does (did?) it mean when aclocal exits with code 63? Karl Berry
• automake-1.16i pretest available: please test Karl Berry
  • Re: [platform-testers] automake-1.16i pretest available: please test Frederic Berat
• [PATCH v2, committed] autom4te: report subsecond timestamp support in --version Zack Weinberg
• [RFC PATCH]: autom4te: report subsecond timestamp support in --version Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [RFC PATCH]: autom4te: report subsecond timestamp support in --version Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: [RFC PATCH]: autom4te: report subsecond timestamp support in --version Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [RFC PATCH]: autom4te: report subsecond timestamp support in --version Karl Berry
  • Re: [RFC PATCH]: autom4te: report subsecond timestamp support in --version Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: [RFC PATCH]: autom4te: report subsecond timestamp support in --version Zack Weinberg
• armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Shterenlikht, Anton
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Shterenlikht, Anton
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Anthony Scemama
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Werner LEMBERG
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Shterenlikht, Anton
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Anthony Scemama
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Karl Berry
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Werner LEMBERG
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Shterenlikht, Anton
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Karl Berry
  • Re: armflang: error: unknown argument: '-soname' Shterenlikht, Anton
• Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Dave Hart
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Dave Hart
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Dave Hart
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Nick Bowler
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Nick Bowler
  • Re: Detect --disable-dependency-tracking in Makefile.am Dave Hart
• [PATCH] automake: rewrite scan_variable_expansions regex Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: [PATCH] automake: rewrite scan_variable_expansions regex Karl Berry
  • [PATCH v2] automake: rewrite scan_variable_expansions regex Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: [PATCH v2] automake: rewrite scan_variable_expansions regex Karl Berry
• Issue with AM_PROG_LEX FX Coudert
  • Re: Issue with AM_PROG_LEX Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Issue with AM_PROG_LEX Karl Berry
• Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter John Darrington
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Václav Haisman
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Václav Haisman
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Karl Berry
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Mike Frysinger
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Nick Bowler
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Mike Frysinger
  • Re: Getting long SOURCES lines with subdirs shorter Mike Frysinger
• [question] how to install a directory to pythondir? Wu Zhenyu
  • Re: [question] how to install a directory to pythondir? Mike Frysinger
• faster tests [was: rhel8 test failure confirmation?] Karl Berry
  • Re: faster tests [was: rhel8 test failure confirmation?] Bogdan
  • Re: faster tests [was: rhel8 test failure confirmation?] Karl Berry
  • Re: faster tests [was: rhel8 test failure confirmation?] Bogdan
  • Re: faster tests [was: rhel8 test failure confirmation?] Karl Berry
  • Re: faster tests [was: rhel8 test failure confirmation?] Bogdan
• Compile a particular extension files, with a different compiler Labeeb Asari
  • Re: Compile a particular extension files, with a different compiler Jan Engelhardt
• propably automake bug aotto
  • Re: propably automake bug aotto
  • Re: propably automake bug Mike Frysinger
• Seeking contractor for a regression bug fix Ilmari Lauhakangas
  • Re: curl's XC_AMEND_DISTCLEAN (Seeking contractor for a regression bug fix) Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: curl's XC_AMEND_DISTCLEAN (Seeking contractor for a regression bug fix) Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: curl's XC_AMEND_DISTCLEAN (Seeking contractor for a regression bug fix) Ilmari Lauhakangas
• if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am ljh
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am Nick Bowler
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am ljh
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am Peter Johansson
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am ljh
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am ljh
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am Arsen Arsenović
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am Bogdan
  • Re: if vs. ifdef in Makefile.am ljh

• Earlier messages
• Later messages