Hi Lucas,
The patch is attached by previous mail thread, this mail is a reply to fix a 
typo in
previous mail, so hasn't add attachment again, please check previous mail, 
thanks!


-- 
Regards,     
Alex


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" <[email protected]>
To: "Alex Jia" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Feng Yang" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 3:41:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Autotest] [PATCH V2] virt: Support multi type in kvm test

On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 04:25 -0400, Alex Jia wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Jia" <[email protected]>
> To: "Feng Yang" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:16:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Autotest] [PATCH V2] virt: Support multi type in kvm test
> 
> On 08/10/2012 11:17 AM, Feng Yang wrote:
> > This patch is useful if we want use existing script to combinate new test 
> > case.
> > We have migrate test script and s4 test script. After this patch it is
> > easy for us to get s4 after migration or migration after s4 by updating
> > configure.
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > Fix bug introduced in code merge. Test patch in local.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Yang<[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   client/virt/virt_test.py |   48 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >   1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/client/virt/virt_test.py b/client/virt/virt_test.py
> > index d9e052e..7ccdcb1 100644
> > --- a/client/virt/virt_test.py
> > +++ b/client/virt/virt_test.py
> > @@ -53,10 +53,6 @@ class virt_test(test.test):
> >           try:
> >               try:
> >                   try:
> > -                    # Get the test routine corresponding to the specified
> > -                    # test type
> > -                    t_type = params.get("type")
> > -
> >                       subtest_dirs = []
> >                       tests_dir = self.job.testdir
> >
> > @@ -72,31 +68,39 @@ class virt_test(test.test):
> >                       subtest_dirs.append(os.path.join(virt_dir, "tests"))
> >                       subtest_dirs.append(os.path.join(self.bindir, 
> > "tests"))
> >                       subtest_dir = None
> > -                    for d in subtest_dirs:
> > -                        module_path = os.path.join(d, "%s.py" % t_type)
> > -                        if os.path.isfile(module_path):
> > -                            subtest_dir = d
> > -                            break
> > -                    if subtest_dir is None:
> > -                        raise error.TestError("Could not find test file 
> > %s.py "
> > -                                              "on tests dirs %s" %
> > -                                              (t_type, subtest_dirs))
> > -                    # Load the test module
> > -                    f, p, d = imp.find_module(t_type, [subtest_dir])
> > -                    test_module = imp.load_module(t_type, f, p, d)
> > -                    f.close()
> >
> > +                    # Get the test routine corresponding to the specified
> > +                    # test type
> > +                    t_types = params.get("type").split()
> > +                    test_modules = {}
> 
> Note that is the python dictionary is unordered.

Very true, I've missed that on my review.

> > +                    for t_type in t_types:
> > +                        for d in subtest_dirs:
> > +                            module_path = os.path.join(d, "%s.py" % t_type)
> > +                            if os.path.isfile(module_path):
> > +                                subtest_dir = d
> > +                                break
> > +                        if subtest_dir is None:
> > +                            msg = "Could not find test file %s.py on 
> > tests"\
> > +                                  "dirs %s" % (t_type, subtest_dirs)
> > +                            raise error.TestError(msg)
> > +                        # Load the test module
> > +                        f, p, d = imp.find_module(t_type, [subtest_dir])
> > +                        test_modules[t_type] = imp.load_module(t_type, f, 
> > p, d)
> 
> For example, the 'test_modules' may be {'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 2, ...} or  
> {'c': 3, 'a': 1, 'b': 2, ...} or ...
> 
> > +                        f.close()
> >                       # Preprocess
> >                       try:
> >                           virt_env_process.preprocess(self, params, env)
> >                       finally:
> >                           env.save()
> >                       # Run the test function
> > -                    run_func = getattr(test_module, "run_%s" % t_type)
> > -                    try:
> > -                        run_func(self, params, env)
> > -                    finally:
> > -                        env.save()
> > +                    for t_type, test_module in test_modules.items():
> 
> And then the 'type' has been sequentially executed by codes, for 
> 
> 
> s/has/hasn't/.
> 
> 
> example, type = "s4 migration" then the result
> is 'migration' case is run firstly, it's not our expected, so we should 
> use a list with 2-tupes instead of dictionary to
> complete similar function, please check patch in the attachment.

Where's the attachment?

_______________________________________________
Autotest-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel

Reply via email to