Lucas, One more minor thought in that space. Is that really reasonable to have separate repo for server and client tests? It seems to me that often server tests might have a client counterpart and they might be developed together. Perhaps it might be better to organize the repos in the following way: - autotest (core) - autotest-tests (client and server) - virt-test - autotest-rpc (remote client, IMO great addition to autotest) + other projects
Not a big deal, just my 2c, Julius -----Original Message----- From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 5:52 AM To: Gawlas, Julius Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Autotest] autotest-server-tests repo at github On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Gawlas, Julius <[email protected]> wrote: >> When I clone autotest-server-test from github on the master branch I >> get expected content (that is server side tests); >> >> >> >> However when I switch to next branch I get there whole autotest core >> tree, see the same at: >> https://github.com/autotest/autotest-server-tests/tree/next. >> >> >> >> Unless I am missing something obvious it seems that there was a >> mistake in seeding that repo. > Yep. I'll fix it right now, thanks! Fixed. Thank you Julius, that was really helpful! -- Lucas _______________________________________________ Autotest-kernel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/autotest-kernel
