On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:07:58AM -0500, Michael Goldish wrote:
>
> ----- "Amos Kong" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 08:28:18AM -0500, Michael Goldish wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- "Amos Kong" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If login timeout, wait_for() returned 'None' and assigned to
> > > > 'session'.
> > > > When call session.close(), this prlblem was caused:
> > > > "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'close'"
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > > b/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > > index a012db3..0b93183 100644
> > > > --- a/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > > +++ b/client/tests/kvm/tests/timedrift_with_migration.py
> > > > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ def run_timedrift_with_migration(test, params,
> > > > env):
> > > > time_filter_re,
> > > > time_format)
> > > >
> > > > finally:
> > > > - session.close()
> > > > + if session != None:
> > > > + session.close()
> > >
> > > Agreed, but we can make this simply:
> > >
> > > if session:
> > > session.close()
> >
> > Yes,
> >
> >
> > > There's no need to explicitly check for None (and if there was,
> > > the preferred syntax would be 'is not None' rather than '!= None').
> > >
> > > Also, just to be safe, we should make the same modification to
> > > timedrift_with_reboot.py.
> >
> >
> > In timedrift_with_reboot.py, 'session' has been assigned before 'try'.
> > If re-login timout, kvm_test_utils.reboot() returns nothing, the value
> > of 'session' isn't changed.
> > So session.close() couldn't cause this problem:
> > "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'close'"
>
> The two tests are nearly identical so I thought we might as well make
> the change in both of them, but I agree that it doesn't matter (unless
> we change the behavior of kvm_test_utils.reboot() in the future).
>
> > In other testcases, if session wasn't assigned before 'try',
> > when calling kvm_test_utils.wait_for_login()/kvm_test_utils.reboot()
> > timeout,
> > It returns nothing, if close 'session' in finally part, Another
> > problem will occur:
> > "NameError: name 'session' is not defined"
> >
> > In this condition,
> > """
> > if session:
> > session.close()
> > """
> > also causes this error.
>
> In what tests exactly does this happen?
>
> 'if session' is preferable to 'if session is not None' because it's
> shorter, not because it's safer.
There is no this kind of test in upstream testcases,
---
I touch this problem, when I write new testcase.
For example,
def run_test_close_session(test, params, env):
vm = kvm_test_utils.get_living_vm(env, params.get("main_vm"))
try:
...
session = kvm_test_utils.reboot(vm, session)
...
finally:
session.close()
> > > We can also consider removing the try..finally clauses altogether
> > > because sessions are now closed automatically when they're no
> > longer
> > > needed.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > # Report results
> > > > host_delta = ht1 - ht0
> > > > --
> > > > 1.5.5.6
> >
> > --
> > Amos Kong
> > Quality Engineer
> > Raycom Office(Beijing), Red Hat Inc.
--
Amos Kong
Quality Engineer
Raycom Office(Beijing), Red Hat Inc.
Phone: +86-10-62608183
_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
[email protected]
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
