On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:11:34PM -0200, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 11:25 +0800, Yolkfull Chow wrote:
> > This is designed to test all subcommands of 'qemu-img' however
> > so far 'commit' is not implemented.
>
> Hi Yolkful, this is very good! Seeing this test made me think about that
> stand alone autotest module we commited a while ago, that does
> qemu_iotests testsuite on the host.
>
> Perhaps we could 'port' this module to the kvm test, since it is more
> convenient to execute it inside a kvm test job (in a job where we test
> more than 2 build types, for example, we need to execute qemu_img and
> qemu_io_tests for every qemu-img built).
>
> Could you look at implementing this?
>
> > * For 'check' subcommand test, it will 'dd' to create a file with specified
> > size and see whether it's supported to be checked. Then convert it to be
> > supported formats (qcow2 and raw so far) to see whether there's error
> > after convertion.
> >
> > * For 'convert' subcommand test, it will convert both to 'qcow2' and 'raw'
> > from
> > the format specified in config file. And only check 'qcow2' after
> > convertion.
> >
> > * For 'snapshot' subcommand test, it will create two snapshots and list
> > them.
> > Finally delete them if no errors found.
> >
> > * For 'info' subcommand test, it simply get output from specified image
> > file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > client/tests/kvm/tests/qemu_img.py | 155
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > client/tests/kvm/tests_base.cfg.sample | 36 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 client/tests/kvm/tests/qemu_img.py
> >
> > diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/tests/qemu_img.py
> > b/client/tests/kvm/tests/qemu_img.py
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..1ae04f0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/client/tests/kvm/tests/qemu_img.py
> > @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> > +import os, logging, commands
> > +from autotest_lib.client.common_lib import error
> > +import kvm_vm
> > +
> > +
> > +def run_qemu_img(test, params, env):
> > + """
> > + `qemu-img' functions test:
> > + 1) Judge what subcommand is going to be tested
> > + 2) Run subcommand test
> > +
> > + @param test: kvm test object
> > + @param params: Dictionary with the test parameters
> > + @param env: Dictionary with test environment.
> > + """
> > + cmd = params.get("qemu_img_binary")
>
> It is a good idea to verify if cmd above resolves to an absolute path,
> to avoid problems. If it doesn't resolve, verify if there's the symbolic
> link under kvm test dir pointing to qemu-img, and if it does exist, make
> sure it points to a valid file (ie, symlink is not broken).
>
> > + subcommand = params.get("subcommand")
> > + image_format = params.get("image_format")
> > + image_name = kvm_vm.get_image_filename(params, test.bindir)
> > +
> > + def check(img):
> > + global cmd
> > + cmd += " check %s" % img
> > + logging.info("Checking image '%s'..." % img)
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(cmd)
> > + if not (s == 0 or "does not support checks" in o):
> > + return (False, o)
> > + return (True, "")
>
> Please use utils.system_output here instead of the equivalent commands
> API on the above code. This comment applies to all further uses of
> commands.[function].
>
> > +
> > + # Subcommand 'qemu-img check' test
> > + # This tests will 'dd' to create a specified size file, and check it.
> > + # Then convert it to supported image_format in each loop and check
> > again.
> > + def check_test():
> > + size = params.get("dd_image_size")
> > + test_image = params.get("dd_image_name")
> > + create_image_cmd = params.get("create_image_cmd")
> > + create_image_cmd = create_image_cmd % (test_image, size)
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(create_image_cmd)
> > + if s != 0:
> > + raise error.TestError("Failed command: %s; Output is: %s" %
> > + (create_image_cmd, o))
> > + s, o = check(test_image)
> > + if not s:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Failed to check image '%s' with error:
> > %s" %
> > + (test_image,
> > o))
> > + for fmt in params.get("supported_image_formats").split():
> > + output_image = test_image + ".%s" % fmt
> > + convert(fmt, test_image, output_image)
> > + s, o = check(output_image)
> > + if not s:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Check image '%s' got error: %s" %
> > + (output_image, o))
> > + commands.getoutput("rm -f %s" % output_image)
> > + commands.getoutput("rm -f %s" % test_image)
> > + #Subcommand 'qemu-img create' test
> > + def create_test():
> > + global cmd
>
> I don't like very much this idea of using a global variable, instead it
> should be preferrable to use a class and have a class attribute with
> 'cmd'. This way it would be safer, since the usage of cmd is
> encapsulated. This comment applies to all further usage of 'global cmd'.
>
> > + cmd += " create"
> > + if params.get("encrypted") == "yes":
> > + cmd += " -e"
> > + if params.get("base_image"):
> > + cmd += " -F %s -b %s" % (params.get("base_image_format"),
> > + params.get("base_image"))
> > + format = params.get("image_format")
> > + cmd += " -f %s" % format
> > + image_name_test = os.path.join(test.bindir,
> > + params.get("image_name_test")) + '.' + format
> > + cmd += " %s %s" % (image_name_test, params.get("image_size_test"))
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(cmd)
> > + if s != 0:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Create image '%s' failed: %s" %
> > + (image_name_test, o))
> > + commands.getoutput("rm -f %s" % image_name_test)
> > + def convert(output_format, image_name, output_filename,
> > + format=None, compressed="no", encrypted="no"):
> > + global cmd
> > + cmd += " convert"
> > + if compressed == "yes":
> > + cmd += " -c"
> > + if encrypted == "yes":
> > + cmd += " -e"
> > + if format:
> > + cmd += " -f %s" % image_format
> > + cmd += " -O %s" % params.get("dest_image_format")
> > + cmd += " %s %s" % (image_name, output_filename)
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(cmd)
> > + if s != 0:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Image converted failed; Command: %s;"
> > + "Output is: %s" % (cmd, o))
> > + #Subcommand 'qemu-img convert' test
> > + def convert_test():
> > + dest_image_format = params.get("dest_image_format")
> > + output_filename = "%s.converted_%s" % (image_name,
> > dest_image_format)
> > +
> > + convert(dest_image_format, image_name,
> > params.get("dest_image_format"),
> > + image_format, params.get("compressed"),
> > params.get("encrypted"))
> > +
> > + if dest_image_format == "qcow2":
> > + s, o = check(output_filename)
> > + if s:
> > + commands.getoutput("rm -f %s" % output_filename)
> > + else:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Check image '%s' failed with error:
> > %s" %
> > +
> > (dest_image_format, o))
> > + else:
> > + commands.getoutput("rm -f %s" % output_filename)
> > + #Subcommand 'qemu-img info' test
> > + def info_test():
> > + global cmd
> > + cmd += " info"
> > + cmd += " -f %s %s" % (image_format, image_name)
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(cmd)
> > + if s != 0:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Get info of image '%s' failed: %s" %
> > + (image_name, o))
> > + logging.info("Info of image '%s': \n%s" % (image_name, o))
>
> In the above, we could parse info output and see if at least it says
> that the image is the type we expected it to be.
>
> > + #Subcommand 'qemu-img snapshot' test
> > + def snapshot_test():
> > + global cmd
> > + cmd += " snapshot"
> > + for i in range(2):
> > + crtcmd = cmd
> > + snapshot_name = "snapshot%d" % i
> > + crtcmd += " -c %s %s" % (snapshot_name, image_name)
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(crtcmd)
> > + if s != 0:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Create snapshot failed via command:
> > %s;"
> > + "Output is: %s" % (crtcmd, o))
> > + logging.info("Created snapshot#%d" % i)
> > + listcmd = cmd
> > + listcmd += " -l %s" % image_name
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(listcmd)
> > + if not ("snapshot0" in o and "snapshot1" in o and s == 0):
> > + raise error.TestFail("Snapshot created failed or missed;"
> > + "snapshot list is: \n%s" % o)
> > + for i in range(2):
> > + snapshot_name = "snapshot%d" % i
> > + delcmd = cmd
> > + delcmd += " -d %s %s" % (snapshot_name, image_name)
> > + s, o = commands.getstatusoutput(delcmd)
> > + if s != 0:
> > + raise error.TestFail("Delete snapshot '%s' failed: %s" %
> > + (snapshot_name, o))
> > +
> > + #Subcommand 'qemu-img commit' test
> > + def commit_test(cmd):
> > + pass
> > +
> > + # Here starts test
> > + eval("%s_test" % subcommand)
>
> In the above expression, we would also benefit from encapsulating all
> qemu-img tests on a class:
>
> tester = QemuImgTester()
> tester.test(subcommand)
>
> Or something similar.
>
> That said, I was wondering if we could consolidate all qemu-img tests to
> a single execution, instead of splitting it to several variants. We
> could keep a failure record, execute all tests and fail the entire test
> if any of them failed. It's not like terribly important, but it seems
> more logical to group all qemu-img subcommands testing under a single
> test.
Hi Lucas,
After considering above suggestion about merging all qemu-img tests into single
test,
I did decision that keep current method due to reason that:
1) it's convenient to maintain so many parameters of each test variant.
2) current method does not affect global results since even if one subtest of
'qemu-img' failes,
it will nor block following subtests (we can still get whole test results)
3) it's possible for user to run single subtest of qemu-img, say only test
'rebase' subcommand
As you also said this is not terribly important, let's keep it going. What's
your opinion?
>
> Thanks for your work, and please take a look at implementing my
> suggestions.
_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
[email protected]
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
