I thought tedbo was going to fix the runlevel command?
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, John Admanski <[email protected]> wrote: > If the expected failure mode is a lack of runlevel, it should probably be > explicitly checking for the command failing with exit code 127 instead of > just swallowing all errors. > Also, it would be nice if there was some alternate method of checking for > "is the machine shutting down", but maybe that's just not possible. > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM, K.D. Lucas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My team is working with an operating system that doesn't support runlevel, >> so I'd like to wrap that in a try block. >> >> -- >> K.D. Lucas >> [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Autotest mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Autotest mailing list > [email protected] > http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest > > _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
