On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Chris Evich <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > I've been spending some time working on the documentation aspect of > "kvm/libvirt autotest is hard to use" problem. I have a DRAFT for a > simplified, combined intro. and quick-start guide. I'd like feedback on > the formatting/layout as well as the level of assumed technical-knowledge. > > https://github.com/autotest/autotest/wiki/KVM-&-Libvirt-Autotest-Quickstart-and-Introduction
Ok, will do it shortly, I gave a cursory look and it's looking good, thanks! > My thinking was to cut out as much detail as possible and rely very > heavily on the built-in autotest defaults. Do you think this is a good > approach or should it be more inclusive of other distro's and > environments? Other suggestions? Environment preparation should have a lot of coverage, although certainly we can have 'condensed' versions of the documents that rely on the default configuration. > My thought was using this to replace the first three bullet-points > o KVM Autotest Introduction > o Libvirt Autotest Introduction > o Getting started with the autotest client kvm test > Here: https://github.com/autotest/autotest/wiki/KVMAutotest > > Then perhaps work on distilling the other pages and "tip of the week" > (many many many weeks old) into more topic-based documents. This could > include info. on using specific distros. and alternate client setups. Good idea in general > I'm open to any thoughts, concerns or ideas on how you'd like to see it > organized? I'll think more about it and get back to you ASAP! Lucas _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
