----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" <l...@redhat.com> > To: "Jan Stancek" <jstan...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Miroslav Rezanina" <mreza...@redhat.com>, autotest@test.kernel.org > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:59:45 PM > Subject: Re: [Autotest] Kernel version for kernbench - F16 make problem > > On 03/13/2012 10:50 AM, Jan Stancek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I hit the same issue couple days back with RHEL. > > All that was needed for 2.6.14 is: > > > > --- Makefile 2005-10-27 20:02:08.000000000 -0400 > > +++ Makefile.orig 2012-03-08 09:36:27.506290505 -0500 > > @@ -447,7 +447,11 @@ > > include $(srctree)/arch/$(ARCH)/Makefile > > export KBUILD_DEFCONFIG > > > > -config %config: scripts_basic outputmakefile FORCE > > +config: scripts_basic outputmakefile FORCE > > + $(Q)mkdir -p include/linux > > + $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=scripts/kconfig $@ > > + > > +%config: scripts_basic outputmakefile FORCE > > $(Q)mkdir -p include/linux > > $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=scripts/kconfig $@ > > > > 2.6.18 and 2.6.20 have similar issues, but with patches similar to > > one above > > I could build it on x86_64, ppc64 and s390x. > > Hi Jan, > > Would it be possible to verify whether my upgrade to 3.2 patch works > smoothly on your use cases? I did upgrade because 2.6.14 was getting > way > too old, and for upstream it'd make sense to track new kernel > releases...
Hi, I tested in on RHEL 5.3, 6.0 and 7 Alpha. It worked fine, only drawback I noticed is that 3.2 takes a lot longer to build. Regards, Jan _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list Autotest@test.kernel.org http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
