On 06/22/2012 02:24 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Cleber Rosa <cr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 06/21/2012 03:18 PM, Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 02:12:14PM -0300, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>>>>> - We're at major version 0
>>>>> - The "stable" (for lack of a better term) is 14
>>>>> - The minor (bugfix) is 1
> Well, I might say this is a fairly accurate interpretation of the
> release numbers.
>
>>>> ^ My original question is in much better context here: is a minor
>>>> release supposed to be bugfix only? AFAIK, this has not been the
>>>> case so far.
>>> My understanding is that this is exactly what Fedora guys want
>>> and for sure that's what I'm proposing here.
>> I understand your understanding is correct ;)
>>
>> That's why I pointed out that this has not been the case so far, and we
>> need to change it.
> Well, 0.14.1 is all about bugfixing, since it didn't depart much from
> 0.14.0. We could spend time talking about technicalities, but the
> purpose of minor releases is all about bugfixing, long before git came
> into the place. So I'm confused as why you think it hasn't been the
> case so far. Since I started releasing autotest (we picked up an
> arbitrary 0.9.0 at the time) A.B.C, where increments in C are
> bugfixes, *mainly*. If some new features came in, it was entirely my
> sloppiness.

Yeah, I had that feeling. But it's good to know that I was wrong and the 
release process is already in line with our plans.

>
> So, no changes whatsoever are needed. It's just that before git, I
> kept svn branches and done cherry picking of commits. With the change
> to git, I've experimented with tags in master, but it clearly it's not
> good enough for the purposes of keep the interfaces stable.
>
> Hence this thread was started. I imagine we can do the same with git,
> only a lot easier and reliably.
>


_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
Autotest@test.kernel.org
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest

Reply via email to