On 07/04/2012 06:50 PM, tangchen wrote: > Hi~ > > If I want to test "virsh -c" commands, any good idea to do it? > I think class VM in libvirt_vm.py cannot meet my requirtment. I have ever suggested to support remote URI, I think it should be what you want:
http://test.kernel.org/pipermail/autotest/2011-November/009440.html > For example: > > I have 2 Hosts: Host1 with IP1 and Host2 with IP2. > My autotest is running on Host1, and of course vm1 is also on Host1. > Now I want to test "virsh -c" option. > > 1. If I run "virsh -c qemu://IP2/system xxx", I don't have a vm1 on Host2. > Migrating vm1 to Host2 is not a good idea, I think. Because it depends on > migration > test configurations, which makes my test more complicated. > OR > 2. If I ssh to Host2 and run "virsh -c qemu://IP1/system xxx", class VM > cannot do this. > > Now, I'm using method 2, and I don't use class VM. And all the "non -c" tests > are using > class VM, but "-c" tests are not. This is strange. > > > IMO, if virsh_cmd() can do this, class VM will support this kind of tests. > So maybe I will modify virsh_cmd() one more time, using method 2. > > Any good idea to do this ? > > Thanks. :) > _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list Autotest@test.kernel.org http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
