On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Satheesh Rajendran
<sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 13:49 -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
>> >>
>> >> +    - time_manage:
>> >> +        type = time_manage
>> >> +        kill_vm = yes
>> >> +        extra_params +=" -rtc base=utc,driftfix=slew -snapshot"
>> >> +        host_load_command = stress --vm 1 --vm-bytes 4G --vm-keep
>> >> +        host_load_kill_command = killall stress
>> >
>> > ^  Here, this is fine *if* stress is installed in the system, so here
>> > it's necessary to at least put a comment saying that this program
>> > should be available in $PATH. (moreover, I'm not sure whether this is
>> > installable in other types of host, such as Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE.
>> > In any case, this is easy enough to fix, I'll test this a bit more and
>> > then apply it with the additional comment.
>
>> Another thing I forgot to comment: Here you seem to imply that stress
>> is only memory pressure, rather than also do IO and CPU stress as
>> well. Why so?
>
> Yes, this test needs to be demonstrated in a more
> stressed environment, I should have used cpu and io stress too.
> Once the patch is available in next, I would change them.

Fair enough, pushed to next, see 45e2bee.

Thanks,

-- 
Lucas
_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
Autotest@test.kernel.org
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest

Reply via email to