----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" <[email protected]>
> To: "autotest" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Vimal Patel" <[email protected]>, "Vaclav Ehrlich" 
> <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 5:02:09 PM
> Subject: Fix for issue #441 cherry picked to master
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I hope I got the email addresses right, since the spice guys are
> still
> not on the autotest upstream mailing list :) 
Yep, you got them right, pulled, we will give it a try, Thanks! (And yes 
according to description in the issue #441 It looks like the issue we are 
facing).

>Anyhow, I've cherry
> picked:
> 
> commit 94f9ca422a4ee7027330bf1e582a5aec67c7e751
> Author: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <[email protected]>
> Date:   Mon Jul 23 19:31:41 2012 -0300
> 
>     virt.kvm_vm: Add nw interfaces to bridge unconditionally
>     
>     This is a solution for issue #441.
>     
>     In kvm_vm.create(), the process of attaching each one
>     of the nics on kvm_vm.virtnet currently happens only
>     if the nic doesn't have a tapfd key. However, on test
>     failure (and consequent vm destruction), this field
>     will continue to be filled up, therefore a new connection
>     to the bridge will never be stablished, making all
>     subsequent tests to fail.
>     
>     However, the old networking code used to stablish the
>     network interface-bridge connection regardless of the
>     state of the nic, when create() is called. Applying the
>     same logic proved to be an effective solution for the
>     problem, therefore it's implemented on this patch.
>     
>     CC: Chris Evich <[email protected]>
>     CC: Lukas Doktor <[email protected]>
>     Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <[email protected]>
> 
> Into master, so the spice guys can fix the issues they were having
> with
> their virt tests. Next was rebased against master accordingly.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Lucas
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
[email protected]
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest

Reply via email to