On 2/12/06, Max Kutny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/12/06, Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 12.02.06 13:32, Sebastien Estienne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > what about doing something like the relaying gateways that i suggested > > > to fill the need for zeroconf with vpn? > > > > I don't think it is feasible to implement something like this for > > mDNS. In contrast to SMB servers mDNS responders never compile > > something like a complete browse list, hence there is nothing two > > servers could exchange. > > > > Unicast DNS is definitely preferable when it comes to high latency > > links. There's no point in trying to modify mDNS in a way that it is > > capable of coping with high latency. There is already unicast DNS which > > is perfectly capable to deal with situations like that. > > Since I'm not (m)DNS guru could point me to the right direction? > Ordinary users use avahi as a tool that allows them to register their > services (mostly file shares over WebDAV) so public file sharing > behaves similar to Window's one. I'm not sure that similar could be > accomplished with classic DNS. >
uniscat dns-sd is also know as zeroconf wide-area is not yet fully implemented in avahi, only the browsing part is implemented > -- Max > _______________________________________________ > avahi mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi > -- Sebastien Estienne
_______________________________________________ avahi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
