I think you guys are overreacting because 1) the public mailing list
*is* the intended recipient and 2) this is boiler plate stuff some
companies make their employees use in their email signatures.
I greatly admire your work but please, if you can't help, you should at
least refrain from decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio. Just like what
I should have done with this email :-)
Cheers,
Celso
PS: no boiler plate signature legalese here :-)
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 26.04.06 12:21, Kingsley, Lisa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The information contained in this e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may
contain confidential information and may be legally privileged. It
is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) cannot be reached
or if a transmission problem has occurred, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this message.
WTF?
This is a public mailing list. If you consider your emails "PRIVATE"
and don't want us to reproduce this message in our archive you better
not subscribe to it.
Please refrain from sending mails with such harsh legalese text to our
mailing list. (and especially not twice!) This greatly reduces our
interest to reply to your mails seriously.
An no, I am not going to "destroy all copies of this message".
Lennart
_______________________________________________
avahi mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
