On Wed, 29.08.07 23:11, Janos Farkas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Trying to not divert from the topic, each vlan should be a completely > separate ethernet looking device, except for the fact, that the "base" > eth0 device is "up", without ipv4 addresses, and this device may see some > some weird packets (the vlan-tagged ones), if watched closely. (That is, > they will not be recognized by the OS as a duplicate of the "other" > packet, but with tcpdump, you can examine them just as well.) > > > If you register a service manually on GW, by calling: > > > > avahi-publish-service test _test._tcp 80 > > > > does this work? > > "Too many arguments", but the following works:
Really? Works fine here! Something fishy is going on. Could you please retry this? > vlan814 is only a pppoe link (think ~ eth2), without actual ipv4 > addresses, just like eth0 (which has only vlan traffic, no actual IP) > > It may be of interest that each ll ipv6 interface has the same address > (and the vlans the same as the base eth0). How this (when disabling > ipv6) affects the registering of the ssh services is a bit too above > my head right now :) Hmm. Strange. Looks like a bug. I will give it another look when I preprare the next release. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ avahi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
