Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 12.05.08 01:45, Stefan de Konink ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > > I'd prefer if we'd also get an interface blacklist at the same time >> > > as a whitelist, but that wouldn't hinder me to merge your >> > > patch. (i.e. "deny-interfaces" would be cool in addition to >> > > "allow-interface"). >> >> I'll do this too then. Since it is the same function. What would be the >> resolve scenario? First deny then allow? > > For security reasons deny should have the last word.
I agree. I'd call them "allow-interfaces" and "deny-interfaces". How about allowing wildcard matching of interface names, eg. allow-interfaces=eth* That might be easier for the people who want to enable or disable Avahi on their tun/tap/lo/ppp interfaces. _______________________________________________ avahi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
