Paul, > >My first test seems to show that it hasn't been resolved. But, because > >at least some of the files in the 10/15/02 nightly build appear stale > >(see my other email on this list regarding run.bat), I'm not positive > >that I've got the right code. > > > > > > Hmm, this is disappointing. > > This is shown in James right? > > My problem is that I can only do a simple instantiation of JAMES and not > see any generation of log enties true to real mail pickup. Is there > any way that some non-junit tests are coded into the suite that give > some run-thrus of certain features/mailets ?
All you have to do is startup James. No need to send mail or whatnot. All startup log entries go to default.log. --Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
