Sam, in this context we are talking about Avalon Framework. Please don't confuse what most of us are clear about with something that isn't even part of the current topic.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:43 AM > To: Avalon Developers List > Subject: Re: Here is where we are divided > > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > Avalon has still in minds of many a bad name about the heavy > > refactorings it did years ago. Avalon is stable, works > well, but still > > developers remember what happened back then. I don't want > this to repeat. > > Avalon is stable? Things like the following indicate otherwise: > > http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-12-02/jakarta-avalon-ph > oenix.html > > - Sam Ruby > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
