Leif Mortenson wrote:
Berin Loritsch wrote:
+1Avalon 5 --------
I think this would go along well with the new ubercontainer. Lets make sure to
provide a good upgrade path. I'll admit, I am still using the ECM with components
implemented as services on most of my projects... Using the ECMC it is quite
easy to use and is stable.
At some point though I also need to move over, but I have also needed to get
the work paying the bills done and needed something stable to work with.
Where possible, lets try to maintain class and package names so that as much
user code as possible can be used in Avalon 5 without changes.
While doing something new is more fun than maintaining old code, lets make sure and all remember the large number of users depending on the APIs that we produce. :-)
Thanks Leif for lending me the words to explain better my position. +1 to the above
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
