From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
leosimons 2002/12/04 05:30:25
avalon-sandbox/avalon5 - New directory
Please wait for the vote to end and the results be set in the status file.
However, it does seem we are headed for the avalon-sandbox route. It makes sense, and it would be better for us to get started than for us to debate the thing till the cows come home.
However, I do want to make my feelings clear on this point:
I do not want to see several avalon5 proposal directories. We as a community need to work together on one Avalon 5. We can't do that if everyone is off in their own corner.
+1
the rules for revolutionaries should be applied for that: a revolution.
Avalon 5 already is one. We don't need more revolutions than one since one is already disruptive enough.
I think we are not that braindamaged that we can't see a point without requiring to run the code. Expecially for non-visual things like avalon.
We are doing framework design, dudes, if email is not good, send some code here or write some documents and place them on the web. We don't need several implementations or branches.
I also propose that every committer that will propose an internal fork will have to go thru the community vote to be allowed to do that.
-- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
