At 11:53 26/3/01 -0800, Jon Stevens wrote:
>Ok, so if you object to it so much, how come you went back and fixed it
>after I complained?
I don't object to it but I am not going to put pointless effort into
maintaining something that no one wants/needs/uses. The only it was put in
was because presumably you have a problem which requires it.
>Also, given that Velocity is known to use logkit, how about you take the
>time to make sure that Velocity still builds correctly against your changes?
Well
(a) I was under impression velocity was moving to log4j
(b) they never directly called the constructor
(c) if it had of broken them it would have taken a simple note to fix it
rather than screaming "bloody murder"
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
