At 07:26 4/4/01 +1000, Peter Donald wrote:
>At 08:43 3/4/01 +0200, Leo Simons wrote:
>><snipped>
>>> To that end, I propose the following heirarchy:
>>>
>>> org.apache.avalon (stable subpackages and interfaces, etc.)
>>>
>>> org.apache.avalon.untested (packages and classes, etc under development)
>>
>>This seems the better solution from a marketing POV. Also, it
>>removes some duplicity in naming (when accessing cvs, new users
>>might think "framework? I thought Avalon was the framework". I
>>just saw an existing user think that =).
>>
>>Perhaps it shouldn't be "untested" but "alpha" or
>>"development". Doesn't matter that much. My +1.
>
>I would prefer a whole other name/brand for that ...
>org.apache.???.*
or maybe org.apache.avalon.framework.* for framework (which is stable) and
org.apache.avalon.* for the rest???
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
