Pete:
How about:
org.apache.avalon.framework...
org.apache.avalon.component...
That gives a split between frameworks and components while maintaining
brand.
Steve.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 05 April, 2001 05:40
> To: Avalon Development
> Cc: Avalon Development
> Subject: RE: Framework -> Stable ???
>
>
> At 01:07 5/04/01 +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> >
> >
> >Proposal:
> >
> > org.apache.avalon == the Avalon suite
> > org.apache.avalon.dev == root for packages in Avalon that
> are new, pending
> >testing etc.
>
> I would prefer to have separate hierarchies as it emphasizes there is
> adifference between framework and components. Having a separate one for
> new/pending/testing seems to indicate they are not stable (which may-may
> not) be true.
>
> I see the framework part as being more widely useful than our components.
> However people may not like our pool/datasource/cli/other utils and can
> instead roll their own.
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
> *-----------------------------------------------------*
> | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
> | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
> | everyone gets busy on the proof." |
> | - John Kenneth Galbraith |
> *-----------------------------------------------------*
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
