At 20:11 20.06.2001 +1000, Peter Donald wrote:
>I am not sure who added it but after I described some of the features that I
>saw as lacking in Log4j they started to appear in it. From a quick glance at
>the source these were Filters, delayed serialization of events, type safe
>enums for priority, dynamic reconfiguration capabilities etc.
What kind of barbiturates are you on? Let me know when you land back
on Earth.
>When you accused me of being dishonorable via "In the process, you have
>copied from log4j without contributing back. I do not think this honors you.
>We innovate, you copy." I assumed you meant I had stolen ideas. I can't see
>how that is any different from what you have done. To be honest I think I
>have "stolen" less ideas than you - just a few names.
>
>If however you are not accusing me of stealing ideas but instead of violating
>copyright then that is another thing altogether. I would like to see
>substantiated evidence that this has been the case for I do not apreciate
>slander.
There cannot be copyright violation between Apache projects. I regret
to have responded to your bogus comments on log4j, a total waste of my
time and yours. Ceki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
