Peter Donald wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 01:16, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> > That's the point. It really doesn't require alot of learning--I converted
> > the tests for i18n package from JUnit to Testlet--which only forced me to
> > change the class we extended and the name of one or two methods. All the
> > tests pretty much functioned as is.
> >
> > As I mentioned in another thread, the graphical feedback of a red bar is
> > much easier to catch than trolling through mountains of logs for the ERROR
> > events--as the debug entries are necessary to figure out what is going on
> > in case there is an error.
> >
> > JUnit is open source, so there is nothing that says we can't change things.
>
> Convinced ... if someone else was to do the work ;) We should probably also
> put a note on testlet website indicating that it is deprecated in favour of
> junit or something.
<joke>
Wow, that was easy! I think this is the fastest I have ever gotten you to
change your mind. This is a historical moment!
</joke>
We can do that. We will keep the Testlet stuff arround until everything is
converted to JUnit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
