yes. manage "max" connections instead of "max-1".
it's confusing to me.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 3:57 AM
Subject: JdbcDataSource Semantics
> Running the tests I discovered that the JdbcConnectionPool class will
> store max-1 Connections and fail on a try for the last connection.
> Should we alter JdbcConnectionPool to be able to manage "max" connections
> instead of "max-1"?
>
> I think it would be more what the user expects.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
