On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Peter Donald wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:47, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Yes, the first thought I had about the name was exactly
> > "AndRotateStrategy".
>
> Sounds good to me unless anyone else has any preferences?
Well, it might be irritating but that Strategy runs like this:
Strategy1 || Strategy2
ie.
size > 10M || (currentTime - last) > 24hours
Isn't it? Shouldn't it be OrRotateStrategy?
Giacomo
>
> > Should I repost the contribution with the new name?
>
> Naah - I will just rename locally ;)
>
> > Carsten
> >
> > > Peter Donald wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmmm. What about the names
> > >
> > > * MultiRotateStrategy (multiple strategies)
> > > * AndRotateStrategy (ands the results of multiple strategies)
> > >
> > > or something else ???
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:03, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > attached is a simple version of a HierarchicalRotateStrategy (also the
> > > > name might not be perfect).
> > > > It can be initialized with an array of RotateStrategy objects. If the
> > > > isRotationNeeded() method is needed this array is queried until all
> > > > objects are processed or the first one responds with true.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
