Paul Hammant wrote:
> You've beaten it already then I think. Start by having a look
> HelloWorldServer or some of the others. Wehn starting new blocks, I
> invariable clone one of these and make it what I want (iteratively).
>
> "top-level object graph" Not sure what you mean here.
Just mean that when we start up the server framework we create a single
Kernel instance, hand it a configuration location, and let 'er rip. Top
level would be the kernel instance that contains everything else. In
theory the juggernaut stuff can have many Kernels in a VM, but we've
never had a reason to do it.
> The only static in Avalon will be genuine factories.
Cool.
> >Worse case, we can use our existing configuration framework, which is
> You're saying what we've done (or not done) is the worst case scenarios
> for you? Perhaps then suggest and interface that could touch on what
> you need :-)
Actually, by worst case, I meant that if we ultimately decide that it
would be too much of a pain to immediately convert things over to the
Avalon configuration system, we could keep our own.
--
Tom Bradford The dbXML Group, L.L.C. http://www.dbxmlgroup.com/
Desktop, Laptop, Settop, Palmtop. Can your XML database do that?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
