> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24, Leo Sutic wrote:
> >
> > I'd say IoC promotes flexibility like nothing else I've ever
> seen. As far
> > as the logging discussions go, I say Berin *restored* IoC in logging by
>
> who did that ? ;)
Argh. Sorry. Berin made the initial announcement
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=100447702127516&w=2) and
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=100454476023586&w=2), so I guess I just
attached his name to that API in my mind. But in Logger.java there is indeed a
@author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Peter Donald</a>
Sorry about that.
> For small projects it easier to
> hardwire bits together - as long as you know that the small project will
> never grow ;)
Well, I see it as a choice of what granularity you select for a "Component". For small
projects, maybe there is nothing worth turning into a component, for larger, there
definitely is. However, even for small projects I find it worth to use IoC - but then
again, the types of projects we work on may be substantially different.
Of course small projects never grow. I keep hearing about this mythical "feature
request" but I have never seen one myself. :)
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
