Berin:
Paul's vote on the ComponentManager interface proposal brings the number of +1 votes to 3, sufficient to go ahead with the ServiceManager proposal. Your reply on the initial request for vote was somewhat unclear with respect your position. If I understand correctly, you stated that in principal you would be -1 on anything not linked to Avalon 5.0. As the proposal is not linked to Avalon 5.0, can you clarify for me if your message should be counted as a veto. If not, I'll go ahead a commit the proposed service package this afternoon. Cheers, Steve. > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 13 February, 2002 10:48 > To: Avalon Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] RE: ComponentManager interface > > > > > > > >On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 02:41, Stephen McConnell wrote: > > > >>(A) Clone interface, implementation, and exception into a > >> new package org.apache.avalon.framework.service > >> > > > +1 > > Given the cost of abolishing Component, this is now my preferred option. > > * It is simple to do > * It fits in with timescales I am interested im > * It builds on existing proven designs > > - Paul > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
