Justin Rudd wrote:
>>>I will fix that problem. Until we have generics
>>>
> in java, we will still
>
>>>be forced to cast.....
>>>
>>C# has it, therefor Java too soon ;).
>>
>
> Just a quick clarification, C# does not have generics
> in version 1.0 because adding generics support would
> be required in the runtime not just the language (or
> so says the MS dev team).
>
> There is some research going on to add generics, but
> nothing yet.
:) Java Generics will be a compile time feature, and I believe
this to be an advantage over C++ runtime generics. It allows the
code to be more optimized while reducing bloat to what we really
need.
Its unfortunate that MS wants to repeat the same thing as C++
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
