Pete:
With the addition of the framework.service.* stuff shouldn't we up the version to 4.1.3 ? Steve. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2002 18:08 > To: Avalon Developers List > Subject: RE: New ServiceManager under proposition > > > > Paul: > Consider it accidental. The only reference to Component was > getComponents. I've changed this getObjects as per all other > xxxComponent interfaces and implementation signatures. Also purged the > component word in the documentation, and updated Phoenix lib directory > with the latest version of the framework and the updated > LifecycleHelper class. > Steve. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2002 16:41 > > To: Avalon Development > > Subject: New ServiceManager under proposition > > > > > > Love it! > > > > There is some mention of 'component' in the > DefaultServiceManager. I am > > not sure whether that is deliberate or accidental.... > > > > What is the plan? Vote or mull some more? > > > > - Paul > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
