On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:03, Torsten Curdt wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 04:40, Stephen McConnell wrote: > > > What do people think about moving the class CascadingConfiguration > > > from cornerstone/apps/orb to avalon/framework/configuration? > > > > Same as I thought last time you asked - ie erk. Until there can be a > > generic intuitive and simple mechanism it should not go into framework. > > ...if you can come up with something better ;)
I don't it a problem with a simple solution. > After this discussion I doubt there is a more "intuitive" and > "intelligent" way of doing this. Berin once proposed a Rules based mechaism that was fairly intuitive IIRC - never got beyond prototyping stage though. > ...but hey, there is something that works - at least for the most > use-cases. you sure? There aint nothing that I have been presented with that covers any of my needs. > And there are a couple of people beeing thankful for this > addition. > > Pete, do you really give a -1 or is this more a -0? -1 to putting in framework. If someone wants they can chuck it in excalibur scratchpad and then move to excalibur propoer when it is more thouroughly utilized. -- Cheers, Pete --------------------------------------------------- "It is easy to dodge our responsibilities, but we cannot dodge the consequences of dodging our responsibilities." -Josiah Stamp --------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
