On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Doh! I was actually suprised to see this as well. The other possibility to > solve the problem is to check for the m_errorhandler as null but this would > get tedious and impose an additional overhead every time you call the error > handler and again is not elegant. Does not look OO either.
yup ;( > Incidentally, even if we initialize it to the DefaultErrorHandler, as > AbstractJMSTarget does not call super in the constructor would it get > instantiated? All java constructors call super - even if not explicitly specified. So that should be fine. -- Cheers, Pete *----------------------------------------------* | The best defense against logic is ignorance. | *----------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>