Hi,
This was the approach taken with an early version of phoenix. However it was
a lot of damn work for very little benefit and I could never justify the cost
of using it.
Is there a reason why ApplicationListener wont do what you need to do?
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:59, Paul Hammant wrote:
> I am about to do some more work on Jesktop (given there is more competition
> currently). Nicola Ken suggested that Jesktop could benefit from general
> services and I am inclided to do that, but maybe there is a case for a
> hot-puggable system like Jesktop to have a Lifecycleable api. As this
> possibly applies to Avalon in genral. As such, I'd like to propose it here
> :
>
> interface Lifecycleable {
> // int getStage(); // maybe ?
> String getLifecycleInterface();
> void startupLifecycle(Object obj);
> void shutdownLifecycle(Object obj);
> }
>
> DefaultLogEnabledLifecyclable extends AbstractLogEnabled implemnents
> Lifecyclable{
>
> public String getLifecycleInterface() {
> retrurn "org.apache.avalon.framework.LogEnabled";
> }
> public void startupLifecycle(Object obj) {
> ((LogEnabled) obj).enableLogging(getLogger());
> }
> public void shutdownLifecycle(Object obj) {
> ((LogEnabled) obj).enableLogging(null); //maybe
> }
> }
>
> And similar for Iniializable, Startable, Dooable, Blahable...
>
> Thoughts?
>
> - Paul
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
--
Cheers,
Pete
------------------------------------------------------------
militant agnostic: i don't know, and you don't know either.
------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
