On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 04:41, giacomo wrote: > Just a dumb question: Is the role implemented by the BundleSelector > different than that of ExcaliburComponentSelector (I thought that > subclasses don't have to change the role of the super class as they > implement the same role)?
Well technically classes should not have a ROLE string. Only interfaces have a ROLE and all implementations of interface share same ROLE. So neither ExcaliburComponentSelector nor BundleSelector should define ROLE IMHO. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
