On Thursday 18 April 2002 11:34 am, Leif Mortenson wrote: > I committed the original patch. I would rather not have Instrument have > any dependencies. > Maybe having an AbstractLogEnabledInstrumentable in the logger subproject?
That would introduce a dependency on Instrument in Logger, right? > Not too unmovable on adding the dependency, but it is nice to have it > independent. > If the AbstractLogEnabledInstrumentable class was in addition to the > AbstractInstrumentable > class, then the dependency would only be at compile time and so users > who were not using > framework could still use the Instrumentable classes. > > Thoughts? Create another subproject to that contains the class that will have a dependency on Instrument and Logger? Perhaps even an "integration" subproject to handle these cases. -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
