Leo,

>>My point is that we have few enough wanting to help with this let alone 
>>if it is done on a branch (i.e. borderline losing me too).
>>    
>>
>
>which is a showstopper. As soon as I have some cycles free, I will get
>Centipede to at least not break the build, commit, then try and get
>Nicola sent in to fix the changes.
>  
>
+1 to next four paragraphs.

>Since no one ever does anything with logkit (no reason to get it from
>cvs instead of release, basically), I'll start there.
>
>Furthermore, I will make Centipede an external dependency, make ant an
>external dependency, and remove things from CVS. Will only remove ant
>when everything has switched and works though.
>
>I will try and get this done before beta releases of cornerstone and
>phoenix. If I don't make this it'll be before a final release at least.
>It's my bet that Centipede will be pretty stable by then as well. Can't
>tell 'bout ant 1.5, but I've always found CVS ant to be rock solid
>anyway.
>
>Hopefully, I'll manage to get all docs built by Centipede by the end of
>next week, and get everything moved over to Centipede a week or two
>after that (you might be able to tell I have preciously little time for
>all this :/).
>

I am upgrading my ADSL connection at home to the level requied to do 
nightly binary builds of Framework, Excalibur, LogKit, Phoenix, 
Cornerstone, Apps.  It should be online in a week.  I'll be able to 
upload jars & sars to ~hammant.  Peter will configure a copy script to 
get them onto the website.  After that, we can consider going for 
releases of Phoenix and Cornerstone.  It should bring on a dam-burst of 
interest in Avalon.  Brace yerselves.

- Paul


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to