... and I thought that patch wouldn't break anything. My apologies.
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Actually you can, if you do <factory> </factory>
Peter> and the whitespace-preservation is off, you (should) get an
Peter> empty string since "\n".trim().equals("")
This would be a hack based on knowing SAXConfigurationHandler
internals as they are at this very moment.
Peter> IMHO the change should stay since it keeps prior
Peter> behavior. (ie undeclared contract with the user). of course
Peter> i'm biased since i spent a few hours tracking it down... :)
Maybe this contract should be explicitly documented then? And a unit
test to guarantee that this contract won't be broken later?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
