Berin Loritsch wrote:
>I just received an offer for a document covering integration of JMS
>and Avalon. I am currently reviewing it for accuracy, but I also got
>to thinking. How do we as a group want to handle such documentation
>submissions?
>
>In other words, is it better for the Avalon site to host all these
>types of docs, or would it be better to let other people host the
>docs?
>
>The benefit of having other sites host Avalon related documentation
>is wider visibility. Users get to see that there are other users.
>
>The downside is that we risk having broken links or remote sites
>that may not be up when the Apache site is up.
>
Go for both ... host on Apache AND host on remote sites.
Visibility is the number one priority - with mutual hosting
your just ensuring that people have access.
Cheers, Steve.
>
>I haven't looked too deeply at the new docs, but thumbing through
>them shows that there are many diagrams and other visual aids to
>help that are nicely done. Unfortunately it is in MS Word format.
>
>What do you guys think?
>
>
>"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
> deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> - Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>