On Thursday 30 May 2002 02:13 pm, Gregory Steuck wrote: > >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> If understand you correctly, you suggest that the caller of > >> TPCThreadManager.run should log the exception? This may not be > >> really feasible: run() is called by that same thread pool that > >> just aborted, so it is presumably badly broken. Thoughts? > > Peter> May we just have to log a FATAL_ERROR and hope for the > Peter> best? I haven't done a ton of thread-intentive programming, > Peter> and thus I'm unsure of other possible alternatives. > > Sounds reasonable to me. It would have definitely helped to catch the > original not-enough-items-in-pool error.
Done. Shouldn't ever happen.. but just in case :) -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
